FreeRide
Sources: Judge in $54M Pants Case to Lose Job

Photo by Lois Raimondo/The Washington Post
AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE who drew national attention for his $54 million lawsuit against a local dry cleaner could soon be getting his ticket to unemployment.

A city commission on Monday voted against reappointing Roy L. Pearson Jr. to sit on bench at the Office of Administrative Hearings, a court that rules on cases involving D.C. agencies, The Post's Keith L. Alexander reports.

Writes Alexander:

The commission's discussions are not public. Sources familiar with the deliberations said the panel hasn't drafted a letter formally notifying Pearson of its decision. Until that is done, the sources said, the decision is not final. The letter could be sent early next week, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the case.
Pearson, pictured above, filed suit after the owners of Custom Cleaners in Northeast Washington allegedly lost a pair of pants he brought in for alterations. The case ended with a D.C. Superior Court judge's ruling in the cleaners' favor. Pearson later indicated he would appeal.

» "Judge Set to Lose Job, Sources Say" [WaPo]

EARLIER:
» "Update: $54M Pants Lawsuit to Continue" [Free Ride/Express]
» "Court Rules for Cleaners In $54 Million Pants Suit" [WaPo]

OTHER STORIES OF INTEREST:
» "One-Sixth of Library of Congress Materials Misplaced" [Free Ride/Express]
» "Out of the Garage: Holly Golightly's New Rustic Sound" [Express]
» "Survey: D.C. Is Cultured, But Unfriendly" [Free Ride/Express]
» "David Copperfield and the Best Press Release Ever" [People/Express]

Photo by Lois Raimondo/The Washington Post

Posted by Greg Barber at 6:38 AM on October 23, 2007
Tagged in Free Ride , Judiciary Square , The District , Top Stories
Comments (21)
  • One word: karma.

    Posted by Kris Coronado | October 23, 2007 12:45 PM
  • One other word: douchebag.

    Posted by Adolf Hurrfruhrr | October 23, 2007 1:08 PM
  • Wait'll this guy sues the city for not renewing his contract. That sucking sound you hear is money being drained from taxpayers' wallets.

    Posted by Ell-Jay | October 23, 2007 1:14 PM
  • And now hopefully no one will hire him, so he can experience the true loss of fund the Dry Cleaners owners felt when this ass-hat sued them.

    Posted by Adam Harrison | October 23, 2007 1:33 PM
  • Judge Pants go bye-bye now. Moves for a bad court thingy.

    Posted by Fark A Lot | October 23, 2007 1:45 PM
  • About bloody time. This guy makes even gutter-feeding Lawyers look like saints. Clearly, this guy is not only a few cans short of a six-pack, but he’s also missing those little plastic rings that hold all of ’em together. It’s a wonder he even had the intelligence to become a Judge in the first place.

    Posted by René Kabis | October 23, 2007 4:07 PM
  • Now I wonder who this ridiculous clown shoe of a human being will sue next? The city for firing him, or the dry cleaners because this is obviously all their fault.

    Posted by Wes | October 23, 2007 6:24 PM
  • to a petty vindictive weasle like this, a law degree is a weapon of plunder. like allowing iran nukes, allowing the unstable to get law degrees is a bad idea for us all.

    Posted by sunny | October 23, 2007 6:28 PM
  • New operant phrase for his ex-honor: "do you want fries with that?"

    Posted by sim | October 23, 2007 8:28 PM
  • I find this idiots actions despicable. Not only is this a textbook case of legal system abuse, his actions perpetuate stereotypes of blacks in general. This idiotic stunt overshadows the efforts of countless black folks who work hard every day and try to get ahead the right way, the American way. We need laws that hit vultures like Pearson in the wallet. Court costs, punitive damages and criminal charges are what the doctor ordered. Strip this moron of his law degree.
    Pearson, you are a despicable person and do not qualify as a man.....

    Posted by jake | October 23, 2007 10:41 PM
  • This man is an embarrassment to the legal profession, particularly to other African Americans who have attained a law degree. In addition to losing his job, this man should be hauled before the DC Bar's disciplinary committee and either sanctioned or lose his license to practice law.

    Posted by CTSD06416 | October 24, 2007 7:58 AM
  • I see another lawsuit in the works....

    Posted by ZeeNY | October 24, 2007 9:18 AM
  • To ALL THE MORONS who are saying that this IDIOT perpetuates stereotypes against Blacks - DOES RUSH Limbaugh, David Duke, Ann Coulter perpetuates the stereotypes that WHITES are DESPICABLE RACISTS??? I didn't think so - SO WHY would the actions of ONE BLACK MAN have to speak for AN ENTIRE RACE???

    Posted by Trace | October 24, 2007 12:03 PM
  • Why would ONE MAN"S action be reflective of an ENTIRE RACE?? Better yet - why is it that when an AFRICAN AMERICAN does something then ALL BLACKS are guilty?? DOES BRITNEY SPEARS behave like ALL WHITE MOTHERS??? Does RUSH LIMBAUGH and ANN COULTER speak for ALL WHITES? Pearson is an individual - his actions are those of an individual - NOT AN ENTIRE RACE!

    Posted by Trace | October 24, 2007 12:06 PM
  • Trace, shut up. No one cares what you are saying, when you type like that it just makes you look like an idiot... perpetuating that image... heh

    Posted by shutup | October 24, 2007 12:41 PM
  • Calm down. Some of us didn't even know the guy was black.

    Posted by Jeremy | October 24, 2007 12:59 PM
  • Uhh . . . yeah, people like Rush Limbaugh, David Duke and Anne Coulter all make white people look like bigots, the only difference between the two being that the aforementioned individuals come out and say it whereas the rest of us are just thinking it.

    I've heard sentiments like that quite a few times, actually.

    Posted by AUA | October 24, 2007 2:43 PM
  • Trace...Chill! Jake was the only one who brought race into the discussion. The way he did was not appropriate, but I think he was honestly trying to expand the discussion. I enjoyed CTSD's reply, which was right on and deftly brought us back to the issue. I don't know if either of them is black or not, but they were civil and willing to speak. Then, you jump into the deep end! Here's some clarity: Rush and Coulter argue against liberalism with some jabs at liberals, while Duke is a true racist. I would be outraged if Rush or Coulter went beyond ideology and said racist things, but they don't. I think Jake could have said it better this way: Pearson perpetuates the legal ideals that liberals encourage, like being against tort reform (which would discourage, or prevent, frivolous lawsuits like this). Please don't think you know what people say or believe just because others have told you what to believe about them. Actually listen to them, or read what they write; and make up your own mind!

    Posted by Timoljin | October 24, 2007 7:38 PM
  • Trace, tell me, if you see a black person, how do you know they are .. ahem. (clears throat for most reverent sounding voice possible) African American? What if they are British? Or Jamaican? Or African? (would that make him African African?) Can we be more specific? How about Ivory Coastian-American? Rwandan-American? I'm part Scottish, part who-knows, can I be Scottish-lucky-barstard-American?

    Also, what has Rush said that is Racist? I mean, specifically, not the usual 'he is challenging my idiotic world view, ergot, he is a racist' type of accusation.

    You are the Six Million Dollar Dufus.

    Posted by Traces_anus | October 24, 2007 9:16 PM
  • Trace,
    You miss the point completely and utterly.
    You say, and allow me an effort to properly literate your muddled argument, that, "when an African American does something then all black are guilty." Or, does "Britnay Spears represent all white mothers." Of course not, and the fact that they are myths, and are not representative of those groups is exactly why one must speak up. I have no guilt over Pearson, any more than you should have guilt over Duke.
    Lazyness, on-the-dole, looking for a free ride; all falsehoods and fair game for social conscience ommentary. If the actions of an amoral, money sucking black man bolster such stereotypes, not only is it appropriate to respond, it is nessasary in my opinion. While Duke does not represent your feelings regarding the race issue, and that is the point exactly, he does not, I would be surprised if you felt no embarressment or uncomfortableness, not just as an American, but as a white. What you are really talking about at the end of the day, is not independent action or thought, but turning a blind eye, making you part of the problem. It is called social and cultural conscience Trace, been with us for a few thousand years and sometimes works well. Nothing inappropriate, even in our PC world, of policing our own neighborhood, so to speak, declaiming our outrage at nutjobs that affect our particular subgroups.
    The fact remains that this is a black man trying to use the system to get something for nothing, and I feel, as a black, obligated to express my outrage, not dispel collective shame or such nonesense.

    Posted by jake | October 25, 2007 1:14 AM
  • Cheaters never win, so the New England Patriots got what they deserved. Did anyone hear Belechik pre-game interview--he didn't have any remorse.

    Posted by Bob Kanner | February 3, 2008 10:37 PM
Post a Comment





» NEW: We've added the security filter you see here to slow the influx of spam that's been clogging our servers and causing us to lose some of your comments. In order to submit your comment, please enter the code below into the box before pressing the "Post" button. Questions? Concerns? Glitches? E-mail us here.

All comments on Express' blogs will be screened for appropriateness, spam and topic relevance, so there is likely to be a delay before your comment is displayed. Thanks for your patience.

Click a section to view its RSS FeedClose [x]