Baggage Check: The 'D.C. Madam' and Signs of Suicide
Dr. Andrea Bonior dives into the world of psychology.
THE NEWS COVERAGE of the suicide of alleged "D.C. Madam" Deborah Jeane Palfrey has raised some disturbing questions.
Usually, care is given in the coverage of a high-profile suicide so as not to validate or sensationalize it as an option, thus lessening the "contagion" that is sometimes seen after suicides of noteworthy people. This time, however, the reporting has been downright troubling, implying almost an inevitability of Palfrey taking her own life: ("There was no way out," screamed one headline.)
Perhaps most baffling is the nonchalance that has accompanied the reports that a journalist was certain that she would kill herself and that she had threatened to, "repeatedly."
How quickly we forget that this was a real woman, and not just a news subject! Not a word was written about why it appears the writer didn't attempt to intercede, offer her support, or warn her family and friends. Why speak now, to the entire nation, instead of when it might have done some good?
This puzzling inaction sends a chilling message: that as a 50-something unmarried woman, her life deserved to be wasted, without anyone trying to stop her. Had she been 21 years old and had threatened "very clearly" to kill herself if something particular happened — as Palfrey apparently did — would it not bother us if someone revealed this only after that event and her subsequent death?
Far more people kill themselves in this country than kill others, yet we continue not to treat suicide as a serious, preventable public health issue. Regardless of the philosophical argument behind whether someone has the right, ultimately, to take their own life, the truth is that many people on the verge of suicide can be helped by adequate mental health treatment — going on to live fulfilling lives and sparing their families years of pain. And no one — even a journalist — should ignore the warning signs of suicide.
If you are concerned about yourself or someone you know, I urge you to call the National Suicide Prevention Hotline at 1-800-SUICIDE (www.hopeline.com).
Talk back to Dr. Andrea by leaving a comment below. To ask a question for Baggage Check in the Express print edition, e-mail baggage@readexpress.com or submit an anonymous question here.












Addison Road
Dear Dr. Bonior:
I can tell you that Jeane wasn't "threatening" to kill herself--it was a promise. As a member of her defense team, I was forwarded by her an e-mail between her and Jason Leopold (formerly of Talkout) where she stated very clearly, "The bastards aren't taking me alive." Incredibly, Mr. Leopold never bothered to read the missive.
Jeane wouldn't listen to anybody. If you disagreed with her, you were cut-off from communication, or even fired as some of her representation found. Of course, it's more complicated than that, but I believe that's the crux of it--it was her way or the highway.
I told others, knowing full-well that nothing was going to prevent Jeane from doing what she did. If it hadn't been on May 1, it would have likely been in prison, a commonality with convicted madams.
This is something we should all be examining: how we throw women away in what is a very sick patriarchal society and culture. "Treatment" wasn't going to make prison or the fact that she had another felony on her record go away. Jeane had been planning this for months. If she lost, she would kill herself. What we need is to put a moratorium on our prostitution laws, which are inhuman.
By Matt Janovic , Posted May 8, 2008 1:48 PMDeborah had said on national radio that she would NEVER commit suicide... the "they will never take me alive" comment could easily mean -- I will put up a fight ---- this lady did NOT kill herself --- she was a threat to big powers in the DC area --- who had her killed.
By Rick Snider , Posted May 8, 2008 3:04 PMExcept that she did commit suicide, and told myself and others on separate occasions that she would. She did put up a fight, and lost. You might consider that there was an element of the bluff, as well as the fact that she wasn't able to prove she serviced such luminaries as Brent R. Wilkes. Proof. I was very close to the story and was part of the defense. Try reading more carefully next time rather than jumping to absurd conclusions through a careless leap of logic (or is it bypassing logic?).
By Matt Janovic , Posted May 8, 2008 7:38 PMwhere is the complete list?ABC?I have been checking out quite a few websites if anybody thought information would disappear with her I believe they were mistaken this ought to be real interesting.
By cheryl carder , Posted May 9, 2008 1:09 AMThanks for writing, all. And Matt, very interesting points. I agree that the laws that convicted her need serious revisiting. And I agree that some people seem to be the type that would do what they want regardless of any intervention, but then one wonders about whether intervention might have made the circumstances, at the very least, less horrifying for her family. Not knowing her or her family, of course, I can only speculate. Thanks again for writing.
By Andrea Bonior , Posted May 9, 2008 1:53 PMIt's appreciated Andrea, and I didn't know Jeane as personally as many. But we had a very prolonged and detailed correspondence that I'll be parsing-out before long.
However, I should note that I became part of the saga from early-June until May 1st (one could argue it's never going to end), and Jeane wasn't going to listen to anyone. Her mother could tell us more, but I assume from the suicide notes that Jeane was a handful, and incredibly defiant. It appears her mother felt that Jeane was getting unfair treatment from the legal system, and it's hard to disagree.
You could say--and this is probably why we came together in this story--because I am also refractory to control by authority. I'm a law-abiding person, but take no truck with the arbitrary flexing of power from anyone. She felt the same way as far as I could tell. On May 1st, she underscored it as a fact.
No intervention was going to make prison go away, not ever, and she wasn't going to go back again. She told me this repeatedly from the beginning in June of last year until her death: "I'm not spending one day in prison." Now we know she meant it.
Suicide presents a philosophical dilemma to a culture that fears death so greatly that we have multi-billion dollar industries that promise some avoidance of mortality. Why would someone do it? Frequently, it's because they know how the world works, and better than the majority.
What many don't understand in this culture is that suicide can be not only an heroic act of defiance in the face of a horrible situation, but that it's often a preferable method of determining one's fate. This is especially true of people with a terminal illness.
We can judge the dead all we want, but there's nothing one can do about it when an individual is as determined as Jeane, or even an inmate of Guantanamo Bay. I should add here that some of the individuals we found in some of her subpoenaed phone records were war on terror detainees. There is no irony here, I believe.
Would we judge someone being tortured by our government (a safe assumption that this is happening somewhere as I write this, ) for committing suicide to escape?
The same could be said of Jeane. Our prison system is unfair and a human rights disaster, a mockery of democracy. They--the prosecutors under USA Jeffrey A. Taylor, an appointee of Alberto Gonzales--wore her down for an unbelievable 17 months, albeit that she contributed to the prolonging of the legal process herself. She didn't get due process, and she died. Go team.
By Matt Janovic , Posted May 9, 2008 4:40 PM